Comment on this article
Read more from the interviews excerpted here
How it happened
Interviews with three who worked for coeducation
September/October 2009
Elga Wasserman '76JD
Elga
Wasserman '76JD, a Harvard PhD in organic chemistry, was an assistant dean of
the Graduate School in 1968 when Brewster made her chair of the planning
committee on coeducation. She oversaw the first four coed classes, particularly
the academic aspects.
Why
Yale College went coed
| |
“ You would think we were admitting women to a college on the moon.”
|
“The
public line was that Yale was going coed for women’s sake. The real impetus
was, I think, twofold. This was never stated, but when a school expands, the
motive is frequently financial. If they expanded with all men, they knew they
would have to lower their standards, because they were already taking the
best-qualified men. But I would say the overriding motive for going coed in November
1968 was that Princeton had done it, and Harvard and Brown had women’s schools.
Brewster was smart enough to see where the country was heading and wanted to
keep up with the times.”
The
transition
“I
think it went extremely well. The two major problems early on were very obvious
very quickly. One was that the ratio of women to men was so small that it was
very difficult for the women. The other was that they had almost no women on
the senior faculty, and very few on the nontenured faculty.
“In
addition, the media were all over campus. You would think we were admitting
women to a college on the moon. They wanted to televise classes. We had
admitted women knowing they would be in a fishbowl, and we took women who we
thought were sturdy.”
Consequences
of coeducation
“I
think it has opened many doors for women. But the doors were opening anyhow.
Women could go to Berkeley, or the University of Michigan—top schools—and
get a great education. But one thing it has done: because women are now
teaching at Yale, men can see that women can hold positions of power even at
the most elite institutions. If they were taught only by men, they did not
think of women as equals. Yale still needs more senior women in the
sciences.”

Avi Soifer '69, '72MUrbS, '72JD
During
the late 1960s, a number of male under-graduates pressured Yale to go coed. Avi
Soifer '69, '72MUrbS, '72JD, chaired Coeducation Week—a student-run project
that brought women from other schools to attend classes and show that coeducation
could work. Soifer is now dean of the law school at the University of
Hawai'i-Manoa.
Genesis
of Coeducation Week
“In
part it was a product of the activism of the times. But the more direct link
was that I had been active on the Yale Daily News, and I covered the press conference
when Kingman Brewster announced his plan for a partnership with Vassar. In that
press conference, he said that women have special educational needs—such as
home economics. And even to me [laughs], a Yale undergraduate, that didn’t seem
quite right.”
Why
men wanted coeducation
| |
“If someone brought an attractive date into Commons, people would hit their glasses.”
|
“There's
no denying that some people just wanted girlfriends. But people were beginning
to wake up to the important civil rights aspects of what became the feminist
movement. And my class was the first class that had a majority from public
schools—coed high schools. The Yale we discovered in the fall of 1965 was
intimidating. But it was also very strange to find the customs as they were. If
someone brought an attractive date into Commons, people would “spoon"
—everyone would start hitting their glasses. We were taken aback by some of
the traditions and the sexism of those traditions.”

Henry “Sam” Chauncey Jr. '57
Henry
“Sam” Chauncey Jr. '57, who comes from an old Yale family, worked in
Yale administration for 25 years, including as director of admissions and
secretary of the university. He was assistant to Brewster during the
coeducation debates and handled administrative aspects of the transition.
Brewster
on the cusp
“One
of the roles I had was to try to persuade Kingman of two things. One was a big
issue, and one was a parochial issue. The big issue was that if we believed we
were an institution which was training leaders in this country—and you can argue
about that—but if you thought that, how could we exclude 50 percent of the
population?
| |
“Kingman Brewster lived in fear that he would die by the alumni sword.”
|
“The
second part was that he lived in fear and trembling that he would die by the
alumni sword, because of the desire of Yale alumni to have their sons admitted.
And I remember looking him in the eye one day, and I said, 'Kingman, I will
make you a bet that the wrath of a Yale graduate whose daughter is turned down
will be twice as bad as the wrath of a Yale graduate whose son is turned down.'
He said, 'Do you really believe that?'
“But
when we were still debating coeducation, I remember a Yale alumnus saying to
me, 'We want our sons to get a good education. You know full well that they’ll
be just sitting there gawking at those girls.' There was a belief that it was
not possible for men and women to be friends, to be intellectual colleagues, to
be working together—that every time a man and a woman came together, sex was
the object. The generation that had to make this decision for the most part belonged
to that group. I had the advantage that I started work at Yale when I was 21. I
was of a different generation.
“Coeducation
was the best thing I ever was involved in at Yale.”  |