Comment on this article
Read comments
Trustees Move Toward Approval of Two New Colleges
May/June 2008
by Mark Alden Branch ’86
Yale is one step closer to building its 13th and
14th residential colleges. At its February meeting, the Corporation, Yale’s
board of trustees, made the latest move in the university’s careful and
deliberate progress toward the goal: it requested a construction budget and a
budget for the increased operating costs that two new colleges—and a 12
percent expansion of the undergraduate body—would bring. The Corporation did
not actually approve the project. But many officials close to central
administration say privately that the outcome is a foregone conclusion.
Also at the February meeting, the Corporation asked
the development office to prepare a fund-raising plan for the project.
President Rick Levin, who has endorsed expansion, says he will seek final
approval at the Corporation’s June meeting.
| |
The report recommends livening up Prospect Street.
|
Shortly after the Corporation met, Yale released the
findings of a study group charged to investigate the ramifications of building
new colleges. The report neither endorses nor rejects the idea of expansion;
instead, in just over 100 pages, it outlines what would be needed to make the
plan work. Adding more undergraduates, the group said, will require adding
seminars and courses (and thus teachers) in some departments—particularly
those that are already oversubscribed, such as chemistry, English, economics,
and political science. The group also recommends livening up Prospect Street to
make the new colleges seem less remote, improving shuttle service, and
developing a “robust security plan.”
President Levin had initially assumed that the new
colleges would house their own freshmen (as Timothy Dwight and Silliman
colleges do) but many people the study group spoke to believe the new freshmen
should live on Old Campus. The report recommends convening a task force to sort
out that question.
Green Roofs and Grad Students: Readers Respond
Yale Alumni Magazine readers responded enthusiastically to our call in the March/April issue for ideas and opinions about the new
colleges.
Some proposed alternatives to the Prospect Street
site. Emmitt Dove '72 of Branford, Connecticut, was particularly creative: “The site … could be used to build new facilities for the Graduate
School and the Law School, with the current facilities for those schools then
being renovated into new residential colleges.”
Lloyd Etheredge '74PhD of Bethesda, Maryland,
suggested ways to improve graduate student life, including “at least one
new graduate residence/dining hall. It might especially benefit foreign
graduate students.”
As for design, Anthony Hayden '50 of Old Greenwich,
Connecticut, sees green: “Why not try gardens on the new buildings cared
for by the botanic part of the science curriculum? Set an example! Cities with
a lot of green roofs could improve the air downwind for healthier
breathing.”
| |
Stiles and Morse colleges “were an experiment that failed.”
|
The key for Horace McCowan '49JD of Richmond,
Virginia, is the courtyard: “I have had the possibly unique experience of
living on the Lawn at the University of Virginia, on the Old Campus at Yale, in
the Yale Law School quadrangle, and in the Queens' College Cambridge
quadrangle. The common denominator of all of these beautiful academic settings
was the quadrangle.”
Two Ezra Stiles College alumni who wrote in shared a
certain note of distress. Deborah Deliyannis '88 of Bloomington, Indiana, says
Stiles and Morse colleges “were an experiment that failed, and students
have had to suffer in them ever since. Please don’t inflict that upon new
generations of Yale students! I shudder to think what might result from
whatever the current architectural fads are.”

©Michael Wetstone '87, '91MArch
Michael Wetstone '87, '91MArch, an architect in New
York, says Stiles “had a strange coldness, a repetitive sameness to
everything, a disappointing lack of detail and craft.” He submitted the
drawing above as a recommendation for recreating, on the new site, the features
he admires in the older colleges: “a variety of sizes of courtyards,
towers, large and small elements, archways leading off to other spaces, an
organic asymmetry, with an unexpected surprise around each corner. … An
inclusive sensibility is required—more details, more materials, more variety
—where Saarinen tried to do the opposite.”

|