 |
||
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The Yale Alumni Magazine is owned and operated by Yale Alumni Publications, Inc., a nonprofit corporation independent of Yale University. The content of the magazine and its website is the responsibility of the editors and does not necessarily reflect the views of Yale or its officers. |
Comment on this article In the early 1970s, while doing research in Harvard’s Widener Library on the Salem witch hunts, John Demos realized that his connection to the subject wasn’t just intellectual. He had run across one of many references to the role of the Putnam family when he abruptly became conscious of his own middle name: Putnam. “I literally jumped up from my seat and looked for a Putnam genealogy, and I traced the line right through,” says Demos, now the Samuel Knight Professor of History at Yale. He discovered himself to be a direct descendant of John Putnam Sr., progenitor of the witch-hunting Massachusetts Putnams. “It took me all of ten minutes. It made the hair stand up on the back of my neck.” Demos does not believe in karma, however. Or in witchcraft. In his latest book, The Enemy Within: 2,000 Years of Witch-hunting in the Western World, Demos uses insights from history, anthropology, and psychoanalysis to trace the common themes that, he says, characterize witch hunts. “The enemy within” is a double entendre, deftly summarizing Demos’s two main theses. First, witch-hunters accuse people within their own communities. That inward-looking impulse distinguishes witch-hunting from discrimination, which marginalizes the “other”: the Jew, the black, the Muslim. Second, Demos argues, the witch-hunting impulse comes from within the human psyche. When people dislike others, they may attribute their own malevolence to those they resent, rather than confronting their own troubling feelings. Similarly, people who feel guilty after denying help to neighbors in need may vilify those they rebuffed rather than acknowledging regret. Historians call it “the refusal-guilt syndrome.” “That's the one fundamental point about witchcraft,” says Demos, who won the prestigious Bancroft Prize in 1983 for Entertaining Satan: Witchcraft and the Culture of Early New England. “It involves a basic projection—that’s the clinical term—from the enemy within to the supposed enemy without. Even though the details are enormously different from one historical or cultural setting to another, that’s the dynamic. That’s where the energy comes from.” The Enemy Within begins not in Puritan New England but in second-century Gaul, where Roman magistrates accused early Christians of feasting on infants. It examines the “witch craze" from 1580 to 1650, when Europeans executed 100,000 fellow citizens. It describes Salem during 1692–1693; delineates the similarities between witch-hunting and both the 1919 Red Scare and the McCarthy-era black-listings; and deconstructs the U.S. day-care sex-abuse scandals that began in the 1980s, including the infamous McMartin preschool case in California. The McMartin trial lasted three years, with no convictions. Demos expects witch hunts to recur, catalyzed by people who see the world as “bipolar.” “It’s good and evil, it’s black and white, it’s either you’re with us or you’re against us. And there’s some cosmic threat at the bottom of things.” Resisting early is crucial. “A defining attribute of witch-hunting is the way the momentum builds. It’s very hard to stop beyond a certain point—because beyond a certain point, if you say ‘Stop!’ they’ll call you a witch.” Angela Weber alleges that “witchhunts” are being conducted against Christians and Mormons for supporting Proposition 8 in California. When religious groups champion constitutional amendments that strip citizens of their legal rights, they should certainly expect some scrutiny and criticism. This hardly qualifies as a witchhunt. More importantly, Ms. Weber’s annoyance at this criticism is downright insulting to gay and lesbian citizens. The negative commentary made about conservative Christians and Mormons in the wake of Proposition 8 pales in comparison to the genuine animus that right-wing religious groups have directed towards gay citizens for decades. This animosity has resulted in thousands of gay Americans suffering from workplace discrimination, being ostracized by their families, and even becoming the victims of physical violence—things that I doubt
I would be curious to hear how John Demos suggests Christians and Mormons resist the witchhunts targeting them in the protests against the passing of Proposition 8 (the marriage amendment) in California. They are being called hatemongers and bigots. A theater director recently resigned under pressure despite his 25 years of service. His crime? Donating to the campaign in favor of Proposition 8. An elderly woman was roughed up for counter-protesting by carrying a cross at an anti-Prop 8 crowd. Churches and homes have been vandalized. Pro-Prop 8 signs have been stolen and defaced. The media aggravates the situation by providing little or no coverage of the legitimate reasoning behind upholding the unique value of marriage as a commitment between one man and one woman. What can be done before this bigotry and hatred escalates into further violence against those with traditional values?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
||
©1992–2012, Yale Alumni Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Yale Alumni Magazine, P.O. Box 1905, New Haven, CT 06509-1905, USA. yam@yale.edu |
||